|
|
|
|
Developments
in Process |
| |
|
LISTS and MAPS compiled by Dept. of Community Dev, 2001-2004
|
| |
|
Recent Residential
Projects sorted by Dwellings/Acre (2/19/04) |
| |
|
Recent Residential
Projects sorted by Dwellings/Acre (date?) |
| |
|
List
compiled 02/13/03 |
| |
|
List
compiled 02/19/04 |
| |
|
Downtown
housing map (2000) |
| |
|
Downtown
housing map ("2000 Plus") |
| |
|
Downtown
housing map (2000 to 2004) |
| |
|
|
|
|
1319-1323 Maple Avenue - Final |
|  application |
|
Construct a four (4) story, multiple family dwelling
containing twelve (12) dwelling units. |
| |
|
SPAARC 801 Chicago Avenue |
| meeting report |
|
Concept: Construct a 20 dwelling
unit multiple family dwelling with retail space on the ground floor.
PROJECT PRESENTED BY: David Haymes
and Patrick Shanahan (Architects)
GENERAL PROJECT PRESENTATION:
Mr. Haymes, architect, stated that the previously
proposed planned development for this site was not approved, and
the development team is now proposing an as-of-right building. The
zoning is C1a, and there will be 20 two-bedroom units, a 1,400 sq
ft ground floor retail space, vehicle access off the alley, and
a 30-space garage (13 spaces on the ground floor, 17 on
the second floor). There will be a 3' setback from Kedzie
although none is required. Floor plans were then presented.
Floors 3-5 each will have six two-bedroom units with storage
space and balconies. Floor 6 will be set back from Kedzie
and have two large two-bedroom units. Elevations were presented
(the north elevation was not available). Discussion followed
on
the screening the loading area and whether this would impact alley
traffic and visibility. |
| |
|
2320 Pioneer Road |
| meeting report |
|
This matter pertains to the proposed expansion
of Three Crowns Park retirement home (formerly the Swedish Retirement
Home). The applicants stated that since the last Plan Commission
meeting, they have continued to meet with the community. They
are withdrawing their request for a map amendment and will proceed
with R4 zoning. Members of the public spoke both
in favor of the project and in opposition (mostly due to height
and
traffic). The Chair of the Commission on Aging read aloud
a resolution in support of the project. The Plan Commission's
motion to approve the proposal as submitted within the R4 envelope,
with the drawings/elevations presented at tonight's meeting, and
in concurrence with the resolution of the Commission on Aging passed
unanimously.
THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED EXTENSIVELY IN THE
PRESS. THIS IS THE LATEST NOTICE THAT SEEMS TO INDICATE THAT
THEY HAVE BACKED OFF OF SOME OF THEIR REQUESTS AND NOW WILL GO WITH
WHAT AN R4 WILL ALLOW. |
| |
|
ZPC 05-02 PD 645 Custer |
| meeting report |
|
This matter pertains to a proposed change from
a former industrial use to a residential use comprised of 15 multiple
family dwelling units (condos) and four attached single family dwellings
(townhouses). The applicants presented the architectural portion
of the project. Due to time constraints, additional presentations
(e.g., traffic, market analysis) will resume at the next meeting,
and public comment will be taken. Continued to the next regular
meeting of the Plan Commission scheduled for Wednesday, March 9,
2005 at 7pm in the Civic Center |
| |
|
ZBA 05-03-V (F)
108 Florence Avenue |
| meeting report |
|
An application by Jeffrey Schliesmann, contract purchaser,
for variations to Sections 6-8-6-4, 6-8-6-6, 6-8-6-7, 6-8-6-9, and
6-4-6-3 for 108 Florence Avenue in the R5, General Residential District.
The applicant plans to demolish the existing
single-family residence and construct four townhouses on the subject
property. Eight off-street parking spaces will be provided in
attached garages. The proposed project will be located approximately
24.9' from the front property line along Howard Street, 1' from the
street side property line along Florence Avenue, 1' from the west
property line, and 2' from the rear (north) property line.
The yard requirements within the R5 district are as follows: 27'
front yard, 15' street side yard, 5' interior side yard, and 25' rear
yard. Additionally, the proposed improvements will result in
a building lot coverage of 48.7% and an impervious surface area of
64.4%. The maximum building lot coverage and impervious surface
area in the R5 district are 45% and 60%, respectively. Lastly,
the proposal includes open steps 0' from the east property line. The
Zoning Ordinance requires that open steps are located at least 1'
from any property line. |
| |
|
ZPC 04-14-PD 1800 Ridge |
| meeting report |
|
An application by 1800 Ridge LLC by its managers
John Cunningham and Tom Engel, property owner, for a Planned Development
for the property commonly known as 1800 Ridge, formerly occupied
by the Vineland Christian Fellowship of Evanston. The planned
development project area consists of all or parts of the tax parcels
identified by the permanent dentification numbers for real estate
tax purposes (PIN's) 11-18-121-022-0000 and 11-18-121-023-0000,
(1800 - 1740 Ridge) and is in the O1 Office Zoning District and
as to the west most approximately 210 feet is mapped within the
R-1, Single Family Residential District. The applicant requests
that the City grant a planned
development as a form of special use including such development
allowances, exceptions to development allowances and other relief
as may be necessary to provide the applicant with the zoning relief
necessary to allow the redevelopment of 1800 Ridge for multi-family
residential. Generally, the proposed project has the following
characteristics: 34 residential condominiums, generally being
23 within the present structure and 11 within a 3rd and 4th floor
addition atop the present structure. The program
contains the zoning required number of parking spaces having and
requiring 53. The proposed 3rd and 4th floor addition results
in a height of approximately 65 feet tot he top of roof and 66 feet
to top of parapet.
Parking generally will be on grade exterior spaces to the south
and southwest in the present parking areas serving the present structure.
The proposed planned development will continue to hold interest
in various dominant and servient tenements or easement parcels including
without limitation those of ingress, egress, circulation and pedestrian
access in common with the current properties in the Evanston Ridge
- Vineyard Subdivision, recorded as Document # 97325012. Generally,
the proposed
planned development will preserve existing vehicular and pedestrian
access ways and the general circulation pattern. No construction
is proposed for the property commonly known as 1740 Ridge. The applicant
asks for a special use through a planned development permit as a
multiple-family dwelling in
the O1, Office District and to the extent necessary as to the west
most approximately 210 feet that is mapped within the R-1, Single
Family Residential District for multi family dwellings, and development
allowances, and exceptions to development allowances as to impervious
surface coverage, building height, yard requirements including transition
landscape strips, parking and loading requirements, & floor
area ratio to the extent necessary to maintain the compliance status
of 1740 Ridge |
| |
|
SPAARC 1567 Maple Avenue |
| meeting report |
|
Revision to Concept
Construct a mixed-use 21-story residential building with 143 dwelling
unites and 4,509 square feet of commercial space.
PROJECT PRESENTED BY: Robert Horner (Developer)
and James Murray (Attorney)
GENERAL PROJECT PRESENTATION:
Mr. Murray and Mr. Horner stated that since they last
appeared before the Committee, 25 feet have been acquired from the
adjacent property (Bank One), per the Committee’s suggestion. The
building configuration and design also have been altered per Committee
suggestions. The height remains the same, but there is a new
parking area along the driveway. New drawings and elevations
were presented.
DISCUSSION:
Mr. Hallen stated that the new parking area does not
meet maneuvering standards for cars backing into the driveway.
Mr. Horner suggested it could be Bank One employee parking to reduce
traffic, but Mr. Alterson did not want added liability for the condo
association. Chair Brzezinski suggested angling the spaces.
Mr. Horner thanked the Committee for this input.
Chair Brzezinski asked about building materials.
Brick has been extended to the base, and brick color has darkened.
Mr. Friedman complemented the improved design. Mr. Hallen
noted that parking access and fire-rating have not been worked out.
ACTION:
Chair Brzezinski motioned to recommend approval,
and Mr. Wolinski seconded. Mr. Alterson asked if they had
a pre-application conference, which they have. They are willing
to repeat it and to work with the Plan Commission as needed.
Mr. Wolinski commended Mr. Horner for incorporating Committee comments
and acquiring land from Bank One, especially in light of their recent
merger. The vote was taken, and it was unanimous. |
|
|
Howard Street |
meeting
report
photo courtesy of Evanston Roundtable |
|
V. PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC HEARING
ZPC 04-01 PD
413-421 Howard
An application by Bristol Chicago Development, LLC by William Patrun,
associate for a Planned Development. The applicant is the contract
purchaser of the property commonly known as 413-421 Howard located
in the B3, Business District. The applicant requests that the
City grant a planned development as a form of special use including
such development allowances, exceptions to development allowances
and other relief as may be necessary to provide the applicant with
the zoning relief necessary to allow the redevelopment of 413-421
Howard and the 16 foot alley north of and abutting that property for
multi-family residential.
Generally, the applicant proposes to construct a multi-family residential
building with the following characteristics:
a) approximately 221 dwelling units; b) a defined gross floor
area (excluding parking, loading, mechanicals, and uses accessory
to the building) of approximately 206,000 square feet, resulting in
a floor area ratio of about 7.25; c) a maximum building height
approximately 170 feet to the top of the roof and approximately 180
feet to the top of the elevator penthouse; d) approximately
245 parking spaces; e) no market retail, service uses or other commercial
units at the ground level, and f) in effect no yards along any
lot lines except that along the front lot line a setback may be provided.
Plan Commission voted 6 to 2 to recommend approval of the Plan Development
to the City Council. |
| comments |
|
This happened Feb. 11t. These aren't exactly
the minutes so we don't know what sort of discussion took place, but
this development is obviously on the fast track since the committee
continued the other 2 items on the agenda and went directly to this
one, swiftly approving it, so it seems. Next it will go to P
& D then on to the Council. Compared to many other bldg.
proposals that languish in committee this is going whoosh! |
| |
|
Rozak Development |
comments
drawing from developer |
|
Architect/developer,
Thomas Roszak recently received approval from the City Council to
build 237 condominium units on the parking lot between Ridge and
Oak, south of Clark. This scaled-down plan replaces one rejected
by the Council, calling for 308 units. The earlier proposal included
a 10% voluntary set-aside of affordable units; this version promises
5%. Twelve units, varying in size from studios to two-bedrooms,
will be set aside for those applicants whose household income does
not exceed 80% of the Area Median Income. [link to our hudconcepts
page.]
A proposal will soon be coming before the
Council that would require all developers of over 5 residential
units in Evanston to set aside a proportion of their units as affordable.
According to this proposal, a development the size of Mr. Roszak's
would require a 20% set-aside, or 47 affordable units, instead of
the 12 promised.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|